Mira Analytics

Ask Mira anything about your trial’s data.

AI-driven, real-time, explainable oversight of endpoints, raters and sites — plus an agentic AI analyst that answers from your blinded data with charts, tables and analysis, inside an environment you control.

Research validated in Phase 3

95.2% accuracy on central rater training

1.57 pt mean difference vs. central raters

Distinguished Poster, ISCTM 2025

Endpoint scoring evidence →

What we do

Ask Mira

Any question, over any of the study’s data.

Ask in plain language and Mira answers with charts, tables and written analysis, computed from the study's own data — scores and model predictions, item-level discordance, adherence, protocol windows, transcripts, secondary endpoints. It runs the analysis with clinical-trial tools built for it, inside your environment; nothing is recalled from memory.

Overnight it also looks on its own, and leaves a short briefing of things worth a second look.

See how Ask Mira works →
The Ask Mira landing page: a composer reading “Ask about this study's data”, starter questions, and a daily-highlights briefing naming drift at Site 021, an adherence gap at three sites, and QC breaches at Site 037.
Rater Oversight

A trained model scores the primary endpoint.

In CNS trials the primary endpoint is typically a rater-administered scale — MADRS, HAM-A, HAM-D — so rater error lands straight on the result the study is judged by. Mira’s model is trained on expert-rated interviews and scores the same questionnaire audio item by item, independently of the site rater.

Where the two disagree, that gap is measurement error on your endpoint — drift, over- and under-scoring, assessments worth a second look — caught while the study is still running. One engine covers any interviewer-rated scale, and every score traces back to the moment in the interview that drove it.

See Rater Oversight →
Interview audio flowing into Mira’s scoring model, which outputs a severity rating for each scale item.
Site Review

One site, in study context.

Every site becomes a review-ready dossier: whether its scales agree with what the primary endpoint implies, whether the questionnaire battery is complete, whether visits happen in window, and how enrolment and retention are tracking.

Nothing is judged in isolation — each site is weighed against every other site and against the study as a whole, so one that looks acceptable on its own still surfaces as the weakest in the study. Early enough to act on while the site is still enrolling, not a finding at database lock.

See Site Review →
Scatter of HAM-D against MADRS with discordant visits highlighted, beside a bar chart ranking sites by percentage of discordant visits.
Platform

All of it in one secure platform.

Mira sits as the analytics layer on the data you already collect — in your own cloud or our dedicated Virtual Private Cloud, connected to your EDC, CTMS, data lake or warehouse.

Mira platform overview grid across sites and raters.

Founders

Founders of Mira Analytics: Adam and Miguel.
Adam — Mira Analytics founder

Adam

Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer

Adam is a seasoned machine-learning specialist with over a decade of experience building ML products in both startup and corporate environments. He has worked in leadership roles, bringing machine-learning solutions, scalable data architectures, and practical AI applications to real-world problems.

in LinkedIn
Miguel — Mira Analytics founder

Miguel

Co-Founder & Chief Technology Officer

Miguel holds a Ph.D. in Artificial Intelligence, having also over a decade of experience working across multiple healthcare startups as a machine learning engineer and technical lead, building AI-driven products and scalable data and analytics systems for clinical and healthcare applications.

in LinkedIn

Reach out

I’m interested in: